first_imgSchenectady County currently shares 25 percent of its sales tax revenue with local governments. The majority of tax revenue goes to the Schenectady County Metroplex Development Authority and the city of Schenectady.This rip-off has been going on for years, and local communities have been short-changed by the county Legislature. Tony Jansenski advised that the county faces its own challenges and doesn’t have to share sales tax revenue at all — “That’s not something we have to do.” We do it because the Legislature is sympathetic to the needs of the municipalities.It’s very upsetting to think that my town of Glenville relies on Mr. Jensenski’s sympathy for our town and others to share tax revenue distribution. Metroplex and the city of Schenectady have rebuilt the city of the backs and support of all communities.It appears that the county Legislature is throwing a bone to our communities with no meat attached. The response by Tony Jasenski only signals that there is no opportunity to move forward with change.Charles BrownGlenvilleMore from The Daily Gazette:EDITORIAL: Urgent: Today is the last day to complete the censusEDITORIAL: Thruway tax unfair to working motoristsFoss: Should main downtown branch of the Schenectady County Public Library reopen?EDITORIAL: Beware of voter intimidationEDITORIAL: Find a way to get family members into nursing homes After reading the Sept. 10 regional news on sales tax distribution, I was appalled by the response of Tony Jansenski, chairman of the Schenectady County Legislature. Glenville town Supervisor Chris Koetzle provided the town’s position on sales tax distribution given to local communities who contribute to this revenue stream. Schenectady County now keeps 75 percent of sales tax money. Categories: Letters to the Editor, Opinionlast_img

admin |

Related Posts

first_imgThe findings are based on OJK inquiries made this year so far, from which supervisory actions were issued on 15 securities companies, 24 investment managers, 14 issuers, one public accounting firm and one public accountant, said OJK acting deputy commissioner for capital market supervision Yunita Linda Sari.“Up to the middle of the year, the number of violations is approximately the same [as last year] but we haven’t reached the end of the year yet,” Yunita said during a live-streamed press conference on Wednesday. Without robust supervision, manipulation can make investors lose trust in the local bourse, which can negatively impact the government’s target of deepening the country’s capital market.Indonesia’s capital market is considered to be shallow at Rp 5.92 quadrillion (US$404.7 billion) in market capitalization as of Wednesday, a steep fall from 7.26 quadrillion in 2019, as foreign investors dumped Rp 17.5 trillion worth more stocks than they bought so far this year, according to IDX data. In regard to mitigating stock trading violations, the OJK stated that it was coming up with new initiatives, one of which was the proposed implementation of a disgorgement fund, in which violators would be instructed to return funds obtained through unlawful means. It also plans to increase market surveillance. “What we want to do is restore the balance of information so everyone in our capital market, be they issuers or investors, have the same playing field of information, so no one is harmed,” Yunita said, adding that the measures would eventually lead to the deepening of the capital market.Calls to improve customer protection against potential fraud in the financial services industry became louder following investment mismanagement scandals, like a recent case involving state-owned insurer PT Asuransi Jiwasraya.Jiwasraya has been accused of mismanagement and corruption after investing most of its premium revenue from the JS Saving Plan, one of the company’s insurance products, in pump-and-dump stocks. As a result, it failed to pay out Rp 18 trillion in matured policies due in May to policyholders.During the first quarter of the year, the OJK issued 184 written warnings, 192 fines, while freezing permission for two underwriter representatives (WPEE).It has also revoked the business license of seven brokerage securities (PPE) and six brokerage trader representatives (WPPE), according to OJK data published on July 8.Topics : False trading and stock price manipulation were among the most common violations found in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), according to the Financial Services Authority (OJK).Other violations include the failure to meet regulatory requirements and breaking the professional code of conduct.False trading is when a person or company creates a false impression of the volume of trade done on the securities exchange.last_img

first_img65 Dove Tree Crescent, Sinnamon Park is seeking offers above $899,000. Picture: four-bedroom home is near new and is on a 978sq m block of land.The home has views of distant mountain ranges and the interiors are of a contemporary style.A separate media room also has extra storage space and there are multiple living areas upstairs and downstairs.More from newsMould, age, not enough to stop 17 bidders fighting for this home3 hours agoBuyers ‘crazy’ not to take govt freebies, says 28-yr-old investor9 hours ago Inside one of the Dove Tree Crescent bedrooms at Sinnamon Park. Picture: is an inground pool and a barbecue in the alfresco outdoor living area.Meanwhile a home at 40 Panorama St, Rochedale with five bedrooms and large living spaces has been listed for sale. It is in the Arise Estate and close to schools including Redeemer Lutheran College. 65 Dove Tree Crescent, Sinnamon Park. Picture: you’re on the hunt for a new home, check out some of Brisbane’s newest large family home listings. 65 Dove Tree Crescent, Sinnamon Park has hit the market seeking offers from $899,000 plus buyers. The large home at 40 Panorama St, is close to schools. Picture: are high ceilings in the entry and cedar wood accents throughout the home. On the lower level the lounge and living area leads out to a patio with an outdoor kitchen and barbecue area.A home at 21 Wolsey St, Sandgate has been listed seeking offers in the high $800,000s.The four-bedroom, two-storey house is on a 600sq m fully fenced block.center_img 21 Wolsey St, Sandgate. Picture: is a formal entrance and the kitchen has a large butler’s pantry. Living areas are open plan and there is a study. The deck at 21 Wolsey St, Sandgate. Picture:

first_imgCoverage ratios at KLM’s three pension funds plunged over the first quarter despite their reporting strong investment returns over the period.KLM Cabinepersoneel, the €2.8bn pension fund for cabin staff, returned 9.6% in Q1, yet its coverage fell by 4 percentage points to 117.1%.Over the same period, Algemeen Pensioenfonds KLM, the €8bn scheme for ground staff, returned 8.6%, while its coverage ratio decreased by 3.1 percentage points to 117.4%. From the beginning of this year, Dutch pension funds have had to use the 12-month average of their daily coverage, rather than the three-month average, to determine their ‘policy funding’, the new criterion for indexation and rights cuts. Both schemes have failed to achieve their minimum funding targets of 126.2% and 124.6%, respectively, as stipulated under the new financial assessment framework (nFTK).As such, they must now submit recovery plans to the pensions regulator.Meanwhile, Vliegend Personeel, the €8.3bn pension fund for KLM cockpit staff, reported a 6.9% return and closed out the first quarter with a coverage of 127.5%, 3.1 percentage points down from December but above its minimum ratio of 123.4%.All three KLM schemes have contracted out their asset management and pensions administration to Blue Sky Group.In other news, Progress, the €5.8bn pension fund of Unilever, reported a quarterly return of 14%.Progress director Rob Kragten said all asset classes, with the exception of commodities, made positive contributions to the scheme’s first-quarter performance.He added that equities and private equity had performed particularly well.Its funding of 139% at March-end equated with a coverage ratio in real terms of 103%, making Progress one of the best-performing large company schemes in the Netherlands.last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *